Qualitative methods for reasoning under uncertainty
نویسنده
چکیده
Come with us to read a new book that is coming recently. Yeah, this is a new coming book that many people really want to read will you be one of them? Of course, you should be. It will not make you feel so hard to enjoy your life. Even some people think that reading is a hard to do, you must be sure that you can do it. Hard will be felt when you have no ideas about what kind of book to read. Or sometimes, your reading material is not interesting enough.
منابع مشابه
A Common Framework for Qualitative and Quantitative Modelling
The paper introduces model ensembles as a common framework for understanding qualitative differential equations (QDEs) and differential inclusions in a precise mathematical sense. It provides basic insights into the communalities and differences of both approaches to model under uncertainty. On this basis, a set of established methods for QDEs, some hybrid methods and standard quantitative meth...
متن کاملOn reasoning in networks with qualitative uncertainty
In this paper some initial work towards a new approach to qualitative reasoning under un certainty is presented. This method is not only applicable to qualitative probabilistic reasoning, as is the case with other methods, but also allows the qualitative propagation within networks of values based upon possi bility theory and Dempster-Shafer evidence theory. The method is applied to two simpl...
متن کاملThe Qualitative Verification of Quantitative Uncertainty
Qualitative methods for reasoning under uncertainty may be helpful in situations where quantification of uncertainty is not appropriate. We demonstrate another use for qualitative models. The qualitative analysis of a quantitative model of uncertainty will reveal the qualitative behaviour of that model when new evidence is obtained. This qualitative behaviour can be compared with the specificat...
متن کاملDeening Normative Systems for Qualitative Argumentation
Inspired by two diierent approaches to providing a qualitative method for reasoning under uncertainty|qualitative probabilistic networks and systems of argumentation|this paper attempts to combine the advantages of both by deening systems of argumentation that have a probabilistic semantics.
متن کاملStrawmen and eidolons: using argumentation to reason across scenarios
We propose a dialectical argumentation formalism for qualitative reasoning under uncertainty in a context of alternative scenarios. Our formalism extends prior work representing knowledge uncertainty using dialectical argumentation in participant interaction spaces called Agoras. We define the notion of a scenario in this framework and consider its formal properties. In particular, we ask when ...
متن کاملProbabilistic Reasoning in Decision Support Systems: From Computation to Common Sense
Most areas of engineering, science, and management use important tools based on probabilistic methods. The common thread of the entire spectrum of these tools is aiding in decision making under uncertainty: the choice of an interpretation of reality or the choice of a course of action. Although the importance of dealing with uncertainty in decision making is widely acknowledged, dissemination o...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001